🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.